<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcast: screening and qualifying</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thesocialman.com/podcast-screening-and-qualifying/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thesocialman.com/podcast-screening-and-qualifying</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:37:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://www.thesocialman.com/podcast-screening-and-qualifying/comment-page-1#comment-666</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 01:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesocialman.com/?p=1151#comment-666</guid>
		<description>I think Nick makes a great point about qualifying after the opener,
but I have a question.

Nick&#039;s point was this:  Say the girl gives a guy an indifferent response after the opener, and the guy keeps his body language towards her and continues giving her solid eye contact.	  It&#039;s as if he&#039;s saying, &quot;It&#039;s okay, you can be totally boring, and you&#039;re still just fine with me,&quot; because he&#039;s so intent on succeeding with her.	The girl sees that and his value goes down in her eyes.   Great point.

But say the guy gets that same response, and starts to turn his body away, and 	fails to make good eye contact.    Trouble is, that&#039;s just what unconfident guys do!   It seems like the girl would see that, and think that because the guy is not confidently committed to the interaction, his value *again* goes down in her eyes.

So it almost seems like you&#039;re damned if you do, damned if you don&#039;t.   I&#039;m not quite sure how Nick is suggesting guys handle this balancing act of looking &quot;confidently unphased&quot; and yet turning away from her and giving her less eye contact.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Nick makes a great point about qualifying after the opener,<br />
but I have a question.</p>
<p>Nick&#8217;s point was this:  Say the girl gives a guy an indifferent response after the opener, and the guy keeps his body language towards her and continues giving her solid eye contact.	  It&#8217;s as if he&#8217;s saying, &#8220;It&#8217;s okay, you can be totally boring, and you&#8217;re still just fine with me,&#8221; because he&#8217;s so intent on succeeding with her.	The girl sees that and his value goes down in her eyes.   Great point.</p>
<p>But say the guy gets that same response, and starts to turn his body away, and 	fails to make good eye contact.    Trouble is, that&#8217;s just what unconfident guys do!   It seems like the girl would see that, and think that because the guy is not confidently committed to the interaction, his value *again* goes down in her eyes.</p>
<p>So it almost seems like you&#8217;re damned if you do, damned if you don&#8217;t.   I&#8217;m not quite sure how Nick is suggesting guys handle this balancing act of looking &#8220;confidently unphased&#8221; and yet turning away from her and giving her less eye contact.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zacharias</title>
		<link>http://www.thesocialman.com/podcast-screening-and-qualifying/comment-page-1#comment-649</link>
		<dc:creator>Zacharias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 09:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesocialman.com/?p=1151#comment-649</guid>
		<description>Possibility to put this talk on the Ipod would be GREAT =)
cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possibility to put this talk on the Ipod would be GREAT =)<br />
cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest on TheSocialMan.com Podcast</title>
		<link>http://www.thesocialman.com/podcast-screening-and-qualifying/comment-page-1#comment-648</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest on TheSocialMan.com Podcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 07:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesocialman.com/?p=1151#comment-648</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.thesocialman.com/podcast-screening-and-qualifying    Category: Charisma Tips &#160;&#124;&#160;&#160;Comment (RSS) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.thesocialman.com/podcast-screening-and-qualifying" rel="nofollow">http://www.thesocialman.com/podcast-screening-and-qualifying</a>    Category: Charisma Tips &nbsp;|&nbsp;&nbsp;Comment (RSS) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charisma Tips &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Guest on TheSocialMan.com Podcast</title>
		<link>http://www.thesocialman.com/podcast-screening-and-qualifying/comment-page-1#comment-647</link>
		<dc:creator>Charisma Tips &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Guest on TheSocialMan.com Podcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesocialman.com/?p=1151#comment-647</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.thesocialman.com/podcast-screening-and-qualifying [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.thesocialman.com/podcast-screening-and-qualifying" rel="nofollow">http://www.thesocialman.com/podcast-screening-and-qualifying</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.thesocialman.com/podcast-screening-and-qualifying/comment-page-1#comment-644</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 21:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesocialman.com/?p=1151#comment-644</guid>
		<description>WIcked. So great to hear Dan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WIcked. So great to hear Dan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.thesocialman.com/podcast-screening-and-qualifying/comment-page-1#comment-643</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesocialman.com/?p=1151#comment-643</guid>
		<description>great cast fellas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great cast fellas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.thesocialman.com/podcast-screening-and-qualifying/comment-page-1#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 16:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesocialman.com/?p=1151#comment-641</guid>
		<description>next time could you include an mp3 download link please? would rather listen on my ipod at work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>next time could you include an mp3 download link please? would rather listen on my ipod at work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karuppaiyan</title>
		<link>http://www.thesocialman.com/podcast-screening-and-qualifying/comment-page-1#comment-639</link>
		<dc:creator>karuppaiyan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 19:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesocialman.com/?p=1151#comment-639</guid>
		<description>very nice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
